lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:18:04 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
To:     Nandha Kumar Singaram <nandhakumar.singaram@...il.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kumaran.4353@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: greybus: camera: Alignment should match
 open parenthesis

On 10/22/23 7:15 AM, Nandha Kumar Singaram wrote:
> Adhere to linux coding style. Reported by checkpatch.pl:
> CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis

Generally, the result of this patch in isolation looks OK.
But when you compare it with your next patch, what you're
doing here becomes inconsistent with the indentation used
for the function arguments there.

There is value in consistency as advocated by checkpatch,
but there's also value in consistency within a single
source file.

I'd stay away from these white space changes.

					-Alex

> Signed-off-by: Nandha Kumar Singaram <nandhakumar.singaram@...il.com>
> ---
>   drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c | 10 +++++-----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> index ae49e37a87e9..6516e7efaab9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int gb_camera_operation_sync_flags(struct gb_connection *connection,
>   }
>   
>   static int gb_camera_get_max_pkt_size(struct gb_camera *gcam,
> -		struct gb_camera_configure_streams_response *resp)
> +				      struct gb_camera_configure_streams_response *resp)
>   {
>   	unsigned int max_pkt_size = 0;
>   	unsigned int i;
> @@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ struct ap_csi_config_request {
>   #define GB_CAMERA_CSI_CLK_FREQ_MARGIN		150000000U
>   
>   static int gb_camera_setup_data_connection(struct gb_camera *gcam,
> -		struct gb_camera_configure_streams_response *resp,
> -		struct gb_camera_csi_params *csi_params)
> +					   struct gb_camera_configure_streams_response *resp,
> +					   struct gb_camera_csi_params *csi_params)
>   {
>   	struct ap_csi_config_request csi_cfg;
>   	struct gb_connection *conn;
> @@ -783,8 +783,8 @@ static ssize_t gb_camera_op_capabilities(void *priv, char *data, size_t len)
>   }
>   
>   static int gb_camera_op_configure_streams(void *priv, unsigned int *nstreams,
> -		unsigned int *flags, struct gb_camera_stream *streams,
> -		struct gb_camera_csi_params *csi_params)
> +					  unsigned int *flags, struct gb_camera_stream *streams,
> +					  struct gb_camera_csi_params *csi_params)
>   {
>   	struct gb_camera *gcam = priv;
>   	struct gb_camera_stream_config *gb_streams;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists