[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230601-cxl-cper-v2-0-314d9c36ab02@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 11:21:37 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
Cc: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 0/3] efi/cxl-cper: Report CPER CXL component events
through trace events
Series status/background
========================
This is another RFC version of processing the CXL CPER records through
the CXL trace mechanisms as Dan mentioned in [1].
I moved forward with eliminating the GUID to UUID conversion I mentioned
in the original RFC thread[2]. Instead a new event type is used once
the GUID or UUID's is used to decode the event.
This remains compile tested with only.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/6528808cef2ba_780ef294c5@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/652f45e29915c_2bb07d2949b@iweiny-mobl.notmuch/
Cover letter
============
CXL Component Events, as defined by EFI 2.10 Section N.2.14, wrap a
mostly CXL event payload in an EFI Common Platform Error Record (CPER)
record. If a device is configured for firmware first CXL event records
are not sent directly to the host.
The CXL sub-system uniquely has DPA to HPA translation information. It
also already properly decodes the event record format. Send the CXL
CPER records to the CXL sub-system for processing.
With CXL event logs the device interrupts the host with events. In the
EFI case events are wrapped with device information which needs to be
matched with memdev devices the CXL driver is tracking.
A number of alternatives were considered to match the memdev with the
CPER record. The most straight forward comparison is via serial number.
CPER records are identified with GUID's while CXL event logs contain
UUID's. The UUID was previously printed for all events. But the UUID
is redundant information which presents unnecessary complexity when
processing CPER data. Remove the UUIDs from known events.
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
---
Changes in RFC v2:
- iweiny: remove uuid from existing known event traces
- iweiny: pass an enum for the event type.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230601-cxl-cper-v1-0-99ba43f8f770@intel.com
---
Ira Weiny (3):
cxl/trace: Remove uuid from event trace known events
firmware/efi: Process CXL Component Events
cxl/memdev: Register for and process CPER events
drivers/cxl/core/mbox.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/cxl/core/trace.h | 10 +++---
drivers/cxl/cxlmem.h | 7 +++++
drivers/cxl/pci.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 16 ++++++++++
drivers/firmware/efi/cper_cxl.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/firmware/efi/cper_cxl.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++
include/linux/efi.h | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
8 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 1c8b86a3799f7e5be903c3f49fcdaee29fd385b5
change-id: 20230601-cxl-cper-26ffc839c6c6
Best regards,
--
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists