lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:27:53 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: display: ssd132x: Remove '-' before
 compatible enum

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:30:56AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 00:30:17 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> This is a leftover from when the binding schema had the compatible string
> >> property enum as a 'oneOf' child and the '-' was not removed when 'oneOf'
> >> got dropped during the binding review process.
> >> 
> >> Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CAL_Jsq+h8DcnpKqhokQOODCc8+Qi3M0PrxRFKz_Y4v37yMJvvA@mail.gmail.com/
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/solomon,ssd132x.yaml      | 8 ++++----
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> >
> 
> Pushed to drm-misc (drm-misc-next). Thanks!

Given what introduced this is before the drm-misc-next-2023-10-19 tag, 
isn't it going into 6.7 and needs to be in the fixes branch? Though that 
doesn't exist yet for 6.7 fixes. I don't understand why that's not done 
as part of the last tag for a cycle. But drm-misc is special.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ