linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/alternative: Add per-vendor patching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231027182529.GQZTwAmY+/OQ8jYFNt@fat_crate.local>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 20:25:29 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Kishon VijayAbraham <Kishon.VijayAbraham@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/alternative: Add per-vendor patching

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:11:47PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But what if I want to do ALT_FLAG_VENDOR | ALT_FLAG_NOT?

I knew you were gonna say that...

You sit down and you implement it. :-P

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette