[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOssrKc6zpsTox58CMvWHAU7EhM1REEk6J9SbV5DaBzurpmr5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 20:23:34 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@...gle.com>,
Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@...gle.com>,
Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>,
André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Revert "fuse: Apply flags2 only when userspace set the FUSE_INIT_EXT"
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:12 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> So because Android userspace is sending a flag value that is not in the
> upstream table, this breakage is ok? Or do you mean something else, I'm
> getting confused.
>From my POV the regression in the Android kernel was due to the
Android patch that added those flags.
Not all flags are equal, some applications use a specific set of flags
and another set of applications use another set. Non-Android apps
won't use the flag that Android added, for obvious reasons.
I still don't see why we'd need to revert this patch due to
regressions in Android. Maybe I'm really dumb, but I just don't get
it.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists