[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023102712-frolic-bush-3d67@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:43:27 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Vamshi Gajjela <vamshigajjela@...gle.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
manugautam@...gle.com, Subhash Jadavani <sjadavani@...gle.com>,
Channa Kadabi <kadabi@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] serial: core: Update uart_poll_timeout() function
to return unsigned long
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 07:26:28PM +0530, Vamshi Gajjela wrote:
> From: VAMSHI GAJJELA <vamshigajjela@...gle.com>
Please use lower case letters like I think you mean to?
Also, where are patches 1/3 and 2/3 of this series? I can't do anything
without them as well.
> The function uart_fifo_timeout() returns an unsigned long value, which
> is the number of jiffies. Therefore, change the variable timeout in the
> function uart_poll_timeout() from int to unsigned long.
> Change the return type of the function uart_poll_timeout() from int to
> unsigned long to be consistent with the type of timeout values.
>
> Signed-off-by: VAMSHI GAJJELA <vamshigajjela@...gle.com>
> ---
> v3:
> - updated description
> v2:
> - unsigned long instead of unsigned int
> - added () after function name in short log
> - updated description
>
> include/linux/serial_core.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/serial_core.h b/include/linux/serial_core.h
> index bb6f073bc159..6916a1d7e477 100644
> --- a/include/linux/serial_core.h
> +++ b/include/linux/serial_core.h
> @@ -773,9 +773,9 @@ static inline unsigned long uart_fifo_timeout(struct uart_port *port)
> }
>
> /* Base timer interval for polling */
> -static inline int uart_poll_timeout(struct uart_port *port)
> +static inline unsigned long uart_poll_timeout(struct uart_port *port)
> {
> - int timeout = uart_fifo_timeout(port);
> + unsigned long timeout = uart_fifo_timeout(port);
>
> return timeout > 6 ? (timeout / 2 - 2) : 1;
So we are now doing 64bit math? Did that just make things slower?
What bug is this actually fixing? How have you tested this to verify it
works?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists