[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023102709-purse-repressed-d8b9@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:07:36 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: Witold Baryluk <witold.baryluk@...il.com>, arnd@...nel.org,
Larry.Finger@...inger.net, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
arnd@...db.de, claudiu.beznea@...on.dev, davem@...emloft.net,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, geoff@...radead.org,
gregory.greenman@...el.com, ilw@...ux.intel.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
pavel@....cz, quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com, stas.yakovlev@...il.com,
stf_xl@...pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] [RFC] wifi: remove ipw2100/ipw2200 drivers
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:41:27PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> For example, I see lots of dead code under '#ifdef NOT_YET' and '#if 0',
> removing those is a good a start. Also converting the ugly debug_level
> procfs file to something more modern would be nice, maybe using just
> dev_dbg() throught the driver is a good option? Or maybe use a module
> parameter instead?
Ick, no new module parameters, this isn't the 1990's, please just use
the netdev debug lines instead :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists