linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Defer on rproc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lebowjyf.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:25:28 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
Cc:     Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        ath11k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: Defer on rproc_get failure

Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com> writes:

> If we already have gotten the rproc_handle (meaning the "qcom,rproc"
> property is defined in the devicetree), it's a valid state that the
> remoteproc module hasn't probed yet so we should defer probing instead
> of just failing to probe.
>
> This resolves a race condition when the ath11k driver probes and fails
> before the wpss remoteproc driver has probed, like the following:
>
>   [    6.232360] ath11k 17a10040.wifi: failed to get rproc
>   [    6.232366] ath11k 17a10040.wifi: failed to get rproc: -22
>   [    6.232478] ath11k: probe of 17a10040.wifi failed with error -22
>        ...
>   [    6.252415] remoteproc remoteproc2: 8a00000.remoteproc is available
>   [    6.252776] remoteproc remoteproc2: powering up 8a00000.remoteproc
>   [    6.252781] remoteproc remoteproc2: Booting fw image qcom/qcm6490/fairphone5/wpss.mdt, size 7188
>
> So, defer the probe if we hit that so we can retry later once the wpss
> remoteproc is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>

Did you test this on a real device? If yes, what ath11k hardware and firmware
did you use? We use Tested-on tag to document that:

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath11k/submittingpatches#tested-on_tag

I can add that in the pending branch if you provide the info.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches