[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231026195356.7624669e@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 19:53:56 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Daniil Tatianin <d-tatianin@...dex-team.ru>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Justin Chen <justin.chen@...adcom.com>,
Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>,
Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] net: phy: Add pluming for
ethtool_{get,set}_rxnfc
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 15:45:07 -0700 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Ethernet MAC drivers supporting Wake-on-LAN using programmable filters
> (WAKE_FILTER) typically configure such programmable filters using the
> ethtool::set_rxnfc API and with a sepcial RX_CLS_FLOW_WAKE to indicate
> the filter is also wake-up capable.
Should we explicitly check for WAKE? WAKE, and DISC are probably the
only values that make sense for PHY nfc?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists