| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1698403778-20938-1-git-send-email-quic_charante@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:19:38 +0530
From: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <david@...hat.com>,
<osalvador@...e.de>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
<mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
<aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2] mm/sparsemem: fix race in accessing memory_section->usage
The below race is observed on a PFN which falls into the device memory
region with the system memory configuration where PFN's are such that
[ZONE_NORMAL ZONE_DEVICE ZONE_NORMAL]. Since normal zone start and
end pfn contains the device memory PFN's as well, the compaction
triggered will try on the device memory PFN's too though they end up in
NOP(because pfn_to_online_page() returns NULL for ZONE_DEVICE memory
sections). When from other core, the section mappings are being removed
for the ZONE_DEVICE region, that the PFN in question belongs to,
on which compaction is currently being operated is resulting into the
kernel crash with CONFIG_SPASEMEM_VMEMAP enabled. The crash logs can be
seen at [1].
compact_zone() memunmap_pages
------------- ---------------
__pageblock_pfn_to_page
......
(a)pfn_valid():
valid_section()//return true
(b)__remove_pages()->
sparse_remove_section()->
section_deactivate():
[Free the array ms->usage and set
ms->usage = NULL]
pfn_section_valid()
[Access ms->usage which
is NULL]
NOTE: From the above it can be said that the race is reduced to between
the pfn_valid()/pfn_section_valid() and the section deactivate with
SPASEMEM_VMEMAP enabled.
The commit b943f045a9af("mm/sparse: fix kernel crash with
pfn_section_valid check") tried to address the same problem by clearing
the SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP with the expectation of valid_section() returns
false thus ms->usage is not accessed.
Fix this issue by the below steps:
a) Clear SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP before freeing the ->usage.
b) RCU protected read side critical section will either return NULL when
SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP is cleared or can successfully access ->usage.
c) Free the ->usage with kfree_rcu() and set ms->usage = NULL.
No attempt will be made to access ->usage after this as the
SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP is cleared thus valid_section() return false.
Thanks to David/Pavan for their inputs on this patch.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/994410bb-89aa-d987-1f50-f514903c55aa@quicinc.com/
Fixes: f46edbd1b151 ("mm/sparsemem: add helpers track active portions of a section at boot")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@...cinc.com>
---
V2: Use kfree_rcu() inplace of synchronize_rcu() - David
V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/1697202267-23600-1-git-send-email-quic_charante@quicinc.com/
include/linux/mmzone.h | 14 +++++++++++---
mm/sparse.c | 17 +++++++++--------
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 4106fbc..19a4b1d 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1770,6 +1770,7 @@ static inline unsigned long section_nr_to_pfn(unsigned long sec)
#define SUBSECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(pfn) ((pfn) & PAGE_SUBSECTION_MASK)
struct mem_section_usage {
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
DECLARE_BITMAP(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
#endif
@@ -1963,7 +1964,7 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
{
int idx = subsection_map_index(pfn);
- return test_bit(idx, ms->usage->subsection_map);
+ return test_bit(idx, READ_ONCE(ms->usage)->subsection_map);
}
#else
static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
@@ -1987,6 +1988,7 @@ static inline int pfn_section_valid(struct mem_section *ms, unsigned long pfn)
static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
{
struct mem_section *ms;
+ int ret;
/*
* Ensure the upper PAGE_SHIFT bits are clear in the
@@ -2000,13 +2002,19 @@ static inline int pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn)
if (pfn_to_section_nr(pfn) >= NR_MEM_SECTIONS)
return 0;
ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
- if (!valid_section(ms))
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (!valid_section(ms)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return 0;
+ }
/*
* Traditionally early sections always returned pfn_valid() for
* the entire section-sized span.
*/
- return early_section(ms) || pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn);
+ ret = early_section(ms) || pfn_section_valid(ms, pfn);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return ret;
}
#endif
diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
index 77d91e5..338cf94 100644
--- a/mm/sparse.c
+++ b/mm/sparse.c
@@ -792,6 +792,13 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
/*
+ * Mark the section invalid so that valid_section()
+ * return false. This prevents code from dereferencing
+ * ms->usage array.
+ */
+ ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP;
+
+ /*
* When removing an early section, the usage map is kept (as the
* usage maps of other sections fall into the same page). It
* will be re-used when re-adding the section - which is then no
@@ -799,16 +806,10 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
* was allocated during boot.
*/
if (!PageReserved(virt_to_page(ms->usage))) {
- kfree(ms->usage);
- ms->usage = NULL;
+ kfree_rcu(ms->usage, rcu);
+ WRITE_ONCE(ms->usage, NULL);
}
memmap = sparse_decode_mem_map(ms->section_mem_map, section_nr);
- /*
- * Mark the section invalid so that valid_section()
- * return false. This prevents code from dereferencing
- * ms->usage array.
- */
- ms->section_mem_map &= ~SECTION_HAS_MEM_MAP;
}
/*
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists