linux-kernel - Re: qemu-arm64: handle_futex_death - kernel/futex/core.c:661 - Unable to handle kernel unknown 43 at virtual address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuQxUhsrL_=uYSAdotU1_Wx7iu5PxFuG9EzWgBE2nMjcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:27:41 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
        LTP List <ltp@...ts.linux.it>, Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: qemu-arm64: handle_futex_death - kernel/futex/core.c:661 - Unable
 to handle kernel unknown 43 at virtual address

On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 21:09, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 17:30, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 08:11:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > Following kernel crash noticed on qemu-arm64 while running LTP syscalls
> > > set_robust_list test case running Linux next 6.6.0-rc7-next-20231026 and
> > > 6.6.0-rc7-next-20231025.
> > >
> > > BAD: next-20231025
> > > Good: next-20231024
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> > > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
> > >
> > > Log:
> > > ----
> > > <1>[  203.119139] Unable to handle kernel unknown 43 at virtual
> > > address 0001ffff9e2e7d78
> > > <1>[  203.119838] Mem abort info:
> > > <1>[  203.120064]   ESR = 0x000000009793002b
> > > <1>[  203.121040]   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> > > set_robust_list01    1  TPASS  :  set_robust_list: retval = -1
> > > (expected -1), errno = 22 (expected 22)
> > > set_robust_list01    2  TPASS  :  set_robust_list: retval = 0
> > > (expected 0), errno = 0 (expected 0)
> > > <1>[  203.124496]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
> > > <1>[  203.124778]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> > > <1>[  203.125029]   FSC = 0x2b: unknown 43
> >
> > It looks like this is fallout from the LPA2 enablement.
> >
> > According to the latest ARM ARM (ARM DDI 0487J.a), page D19-6475, that "unknown
> > 43" (0x2b / 0b101011) is the DFSC for a level -1 translation fault:
> >
> >         0b101011 When FEAT_LPA2 is implemented:
> >                  Translation fault, level -1.
> >
> > It's triggered here by an LDTR in a get_user() on a bogus userspace address.
> > The exception is expected, and it's supposed to be handled via the exception
> > fixups, but the LPA2 patches didn't update the fault_info table entries for all
> > the level -1 faults, and so those all get handled by do_bad() and don't call
> > fixup_exception(), causing them to be fatal.
> >
> > It should be relatively simple to update the fault_info table for the level -1
> > faults, but given the other issues we're seeing I think it's probably worth
> > dropping the LPA2 patches for the moment.
> >
>
> Thanks for the analysis Mark.
>
> I agree that this should not be difficult to fix, but given the other
> CI problems and identified loose ends, I am not going to object to
> dropping this partially or entirely at this point. I'm sure everybody
> will be thrilled to go over those 60 patches again after I rebase them
> onto v6.7-rc1 :-)

I am happy to test any proposed fix patch.

- Naresh