[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5db80b63-65da-407c-a019-048dea8c1a89@hatter.bewilderbeest.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 04:00:47 -0700
From: Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"Milton D. Miller II" <mdmii@...look.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ivan Mikhaylov <i.mikhaylov@...ro.com>,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] watchdog: aspeed: Add aspeed,reset-mask property
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:42:32AM PDT, Zev Weiss wrote:
>Hello,
>
>These patches add a new aspeed,reset-mask DT property for the Aspeed
>watchdog timer, which specifies exactly which peripherals should be
>reset by the watchdog timer.
>
>This series is a replacement for a patch I sent earlier [0], though
>using an entirely different (DT-based) approach and hence not exactly
>a v2.
>
>I've tested these patches on ast2500 hardware and a qemu ast2600
>model; test results on actual ast2600 hardware would be welcome.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Zev
>
>
>[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-watchdog/20230922013542.29136-2-zev@bewilderbeest.net/
>
>Zev Weiss (2):
> dt-bindings: watchdog: aspeed-wdt: Add aspeed,reset-mask property
> watchdog: aspeed: Add support for aspeed,reset-mask DT property
>
> .../bindings/watchdog/aspeed-wdt.txt | 18 +++-
> drivers/watchdog/aspeed_wdt.c | 11 +++
> include/dt-bindings/watchdog/aspeed-wdt.h | 92 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/watchdog/aspeed-wdt.h
>
Ping...Guenter, if we stick with the simpler approach in this version of
the patches (which I'm fine with and seems to have passed muster with
Rob & Joel) does this look okay as is?
Thanks,
Zev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists