linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Fixes and improvements for RS485

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023102707-customer-nastiness-9c80@gregkh>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 13:03:52 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>
Cc:     jirislaby@...nel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
        u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
        alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, cniedermaier@...electronics.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        LinoSanfilippo@....de, lukas@...ner.de, p.rosenberger@...bus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Fixes and improvements for RS485

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 07:48:33PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> The following series includes some fixes and improvements around RS485 in
> the serial core and UART drivers:
> 
> Patch 1: Do not hold the port lock when setting rx-during-tx GPIO
> Patch 2: set missing supported flag for RX during TX GPIO
> Patch 3: fix sanitizing check for RTS settings
> Patch 4: make sure RS485 is cannot be enabled when it is not supported
> Patch 5: imx: do not set RS485 enabled if it is not supported
> Patch 6: omap: do not override settings for rs485 support
> Patch 7: exar: set missing RS485 supported flag
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - add comment for function uart_set_rs485_gpios after hint from Hugo
> - correct commit message as pointed out by Hugo
> - rephrase commit messages
> - add patch 7 after discussion with Ilpo

There's a lot of fuzz for this series against my current tree, so much
so I don't feel comfortable taking it right now.  Can you resend it
after 6.7-rc1 is out and you have rebased it against that?  If these
really are all bugfixes, we can still get them into 6.7-final then.

thanks,

greg k-h