linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] iommu: Change kconfig around IOMMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:20:13 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     "Zhang, Tina" <tina.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux.dev" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>,
        Michael Shavit <mshavit@...gle.com>,
        Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] iommu: Change kconfig around IOMMU_SVA

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 09:14:17AM +0000, Zhang, Tina wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:05:20AM +0800, Tina Zhang wrote:
> > > > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> > > >
> > > > Linus suggested that the kconfig here is confusing:
> > >
> > > While this patch looks decent to me, you forgot to Cc Linus on it. In
> > > general, given that it touches a couple of core files, I'd like to
> > > wait for some more people to have a look at it and not rushing anything in.
> > Make sense. I'll CC Linus. Comments are welcome.

> Can we separate this patch? I'm thinking about CC more people for
> review. At least, we need to CC all the reviewers of
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230506133134.1492395-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com/
> to this patch. So, it seems more reasonable to separate this
> patch. What do you think?

I think that makes sense, let's go ahead with the rest of the SVA
series and we can do this next cycle. Bikeshedding config names isn't
really critical.

Jason