linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: light: Add support for APDS9306 Light Sensor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab671f50-7a0f-4e72-98a0-fa4d5f2ed889@tweaklogic.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 22:12:11 +1030
From:   Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paul Gazzillo <paul@...zz.com>
Cc:     Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.sg>,
        Stefan Windfeldt-Prytz <stefan.windfeldt-prytz@...s.com>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: light: Add support for APDS9306 Light Sensor

On 27/10/23 21:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/10/2023 10:42, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
>> 4. Conor reviewed the patch and said that it would be better that I handle all
>>      these operations in apds9306 driver (this) patch series rather than submitting
>>      a new patch.
>>      "Ahh apologies then. The best course of action would likely be to include
>>       the patch merging the two bindings in your series adding the third user."
>> 5. As per this patch series -- RFC->v0->v1-v2
> 
> RFC was the first version sent to mailing list. So after RFC there is
> second version - v2. This is v4.

Acknowledging all your other comments. Appreciate your time and effort in reviewing
this. One last question on this - So what version should I use for the patchset
which I will submit next - "v3" or "v5" in the Subject of the emails?

Regards,
Subhajit Ghosh