linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the landlock tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231027.Soon0Gee4xul@digikod.net>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:56:00 +0200
From:   Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the landlock tree

Thanks Stephen, your patch is good! I tested it with the merge of my
branch and LSM/dev-staging.

The new Landlock changes (tested in -next for a few weeks) add a new
call to security_add_hooks() which gets a new signature with commit
9b09f11320db ("LSM: Identify modules by more than name") from
the LSM/dev-staging branch [1].

I plan to send a PR with my branch in the next merge window (for
v6.7-rc1).

We should squash Stephen's patch in commit 9b09f11320db ("LSM:
Identify modules by more than name") but it would not be possible
without my branch. I see two solutions:
* keep Stephen's patch in -next only, or
* rebase LSM/dev-staging on my branch now, and rebase it later on
  v6.7-rc1 once my branch is merged (which is the workflow described in
  [1]).

Paul, what do you think?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHC9VhS1wwgH6NNd+cJz4MYogPiRV8NyPDd1yj5SpaxeUB4UVg@mail.gmail.com

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 04:34:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the landlock tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> In file included from security/landlock/net.c:14:
> security/landlock/net.c: In function 'landlock_add_net_hooks':
> security/landlock/common.h:12:23: error: passing argument 3 of 'security_add_hooks' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>    12 | #define LANDLOCK_NAME "landlock"
>       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~
>       |                       |
>       |                       char *
> security/landlock/net.c:199:28: note: in expansion of macro 'LANDLOCK_NAME'
>   199 |                            LANDLOCK_NAME);
>       |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from security/landlock/setup.h:12,
>                  from security/landlock/cred.h:17,
>                  from security/landlock/net.c:15:
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h:120:53: note: expected 'const struct lsm_id *' but argument is of type 'char *'
>   120 |                                const struct lsm_id *lsmid);
>       |                                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   fff69fb03dde ("landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and connect")
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   9b09f11320db ("LSM: Identify modules by more than name")
> 
> from the security tree.
> 
> I have applied the following merge resolution patch.
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:13:32 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] fixup for "landlock: Support network rules with TCP bind and
>  connect"
> 
> interacting with "LSM: Identify modules by more than name"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  security/landlock/net.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/landlock/net.c b/security/landlock/net.c
> index aaa92c2b1f08..efa1b644a4af 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/net.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/net.c
> @@ -196,5 +196,5 @@ static struct security_hook_list landlock_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
>  __init void landlock_add_net_hooks(void)
>  {
>  	security_add_hooks(landlock_hooks, ARRAY_SIZE(landlock_hooks),
> -			   LANDLOCK_NAME);
> +			   &landlock_lsmid);
>  }
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell