linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/11] iio: adc: Add support for QCOM PMIC5 Gen3 ADC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231027142512.37358c60@jic23-huawei>
Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:26:18 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
Cc:     <agross@...nel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <quic_subbaram@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>, <quic_kamalw@...cinc.com>,
        <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "Bjorn Andersson" <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
        "Mike Looijmans" <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
        Ramona Bolboaca <ramona.bolboaca@...log.com>,
        ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
        "Ibrahim Tilki" <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
        William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Leonard Göhrs <l.goehrs@...gutronix.de>,
        Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] iio: adc: Add support for QCOM PMIC5 Gen3 ADC

> > +  
> >> +static const struct iio_info adc5_gen3_info = {
> >> +	.read_raw = adc5_gen3_read_raw,
> >> +	.fwnode_xlate = adc5_gen3_fwnode_xlate,
> >> +};  
> > ...  
> 
> 
> Did you mean to leave any comment here...?

Nope ... is a cut mark to indicate I dropped a load of quoted text.

On that note, don't bother replying to say you'll do things suggested
by reviewers - we assume you will unless you say otherwise :)

If you want to add a boilerplate message alongside comments on the
bits that need further discussion, along the lines of 
"All other comments accepted." That's fine but it's not really necessary.

...

> >> +
> >> +static int adc5_gen3_exit(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> +{  
> > As you are mixing devm manged cleanup and the explicit sort the
> > result is that you remove the userspace interfaces 'after' you run
> > everything in here. I'm thinking disabling the channels at least
> > isn't a good idea in that case.
> >
> > If you want to use devm (which is good) then you need to work out how
> > to register additional callbacks during probe to tear down everything in
> > the right order (typically the reverse of what happens in probe)
> > devm_add_action_or_reset() is the way to add those extra callbacks.
> >
> > If not, just don't use devm for at least those bits that will end up
> > running out of order (such as iio_device_register()) and manually call their
> > cleanup routines instead.  
> 
> 
> I checked some other examples in the iio/adc/ folder, I think I see what 
> you mean here. It looks like drivers with a remove callback always use 
> iio_device_register and iio_device_unregister instead of the devm_* 
> variant, due to the issue with sysfs removal as you said.
> 
> I'll update the probe and remove functions similarly, to do explicit 
> cleanups as required, avoiding devm_ usage for places where it should be 
> avoided.

Better to go the other way as Dmitry suggested.  Make everything you can
devm managed.