[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231027100641.52fbee5d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:06:41 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix: rseq uapi: Adapt header includes to follow glibc
header changes
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:37:26 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> On 2023-10-27 03:53, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Mathieu,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
> > [also build test WARNING on v6.6-rc7 next-20231026]
> > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> The test robot complains about using <asm/types.h> in uapi headers for
> !__KERNEL__ case.
>
> Steven, was there something wrong with including linux/types.h in uapi
> headers ?
>
Actually, linux/types.h includes asm/types.h so I don't think that was the
issue. I think the issue was mostly with:
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
Replacing linux/types.h with asm/types.h worked, but may have been
unnecessary.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists