[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce31d930-b247-49d1-8bda-9fb533d4da41@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:45:47 -0400
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Hardik Gajjar <hgajjar@...adit-jv.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
erosca@...adit-jv.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] usb: Reduce the 'SET_ADDRESS' request timeout with a
new quirk
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:57:35AM +0200, Hardik Gajjar wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 02:34:22PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > As remarked earlier, we don't need to have the "_MS" suffix on either
> > the macro name or the "timeout_ms" variable name. Removing the suffix
> > will be more consistent with the USB_TP_TRANSMISSION_DELAY_MAX and
> > USB_PING_RESPONSE_TIME names you see above.
>
> I understand the suffix _MS in macro but the suffix is variable name was
> added after the comment about timeout unit from Greg in patchV2.
>
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=169687322126192&w=2
Greg merely wanted you to document what the timeout units are. You can
do this either by adding a "_ms" suffix to the variable name or by
mentioning it in a comment. For example:
+ unsigned int timeout = USB_CTRL_SET_TIMEOUT; /* ms */
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists