[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <653c5691a2372_780ef2949b@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 17:32:17 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"Alison Schofield" <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Ben Widawsky <bwidawsk@...nel.org>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Terry Bowman" <terry.bowman@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/20] cxl/port: Fix release of RCD endpoints
Robert Richter wrote:
> Dan,
[..]
>
> delete_endpoint() is called here, but the uport etc. is not unbound.
> Which means this is not true:
>
> if (parent->driver && !endpoint->dead) {
> ...
>
> I don't remember this with my patch. The parent is there different, so
> that could be the reason.
>
> I could not yet look into more detail but wanted to let you know. Will
> continue.
Apologies, I didn't have that regression going, I think I see the issue.
Thanks for the heads up.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists