lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 28 Oct 2023 12:23:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     LihaSika <lihasika@...il.com>,
        Linux USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux USB Storage <usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Milan Svoboda <milan.svoboda@...trum.cz>,
        Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: storage: set 1.50 as the lower bcdDevice for older
 "Super Top" compatibility

On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 02:02:37PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 08:28:04PM +0300, LihaSika wrote:
> > Change lower bcdDevice value for "Super Top USB 2.0  SATA BRIDGE" to match
> > 1.50. I have such an older device with bcdDevice=1.50 and it will not work
> > otherwise.
> 
> What about below description?
> 
> ```
> Some old USB hard drives using Super Top USB 2.0 SATA bridge have lower
> minimum bcdDevice value than currently allowed (1.60). Such devices
> cannot be used by ums-cypress driver since their bcdDevice is out of range.
> 
> Lower minimum bcdDevice to fix that. 
> ```
> 
> > 
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Liha Sikanen <lihasika@...il.com>
> 
> Is your intended author name in your From: header or Signed-off-by: trailer?
> 
> Also, don't forget to add Fixes: tag; that is:
> 
> Fixes: a9c143c82608 ("usb-storage: restrict bcdDevice range for Super Top in Cypress ATACB")
> 
> When above reviews are addressed, resend as v2. Make sure that the patch
> subject begins with `[PATCH v2]`.

There's no need, I can take this as-is, thanks.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ