[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231028213738.476725c68a1473e1418231b0@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 21:37:38 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, suleiman@...gle.com,
briannorris@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PM: sleep: Expose last succeeded resumed timestamp
in sysfs
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 19:26:10 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
> [also build test WARNING on v6.6-rc7 next-20231027]
> [cannot apply to pavel-leds/for-next]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Masami-Hiramatsu-Google/PM-sleep-Expose-last-succeeded-resumed-timestamp-in-sysfs/20231028-093251
> base: linus/master
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/169845668624.1319505.1097714089024984847.stgit%40mhiramat.roam.corp.google.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v2] PM: sleep: Expose last succeeded resumed timestamp in sysfs
> config: mips-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231028/202310281942.ZwkSMsVB-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231028/202310281942.ZwkSMsVB-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310281942.ZwkSMsVB-lkp@intel.com/
Oops, I missed casting. Let me fix it.
Thanks,
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> kernel/power/main.c: In function 'last_success_resume_time_show':
> >> kernel/power/main.c:427:38: warning: format '%llu' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long int' [-Wformat=]
> 427 | return sprintf(buf, "%llu.%llu\n",
> | ~~~^
> | |
> | long long unsigned int
> | %lu
> 428 | suspend_stats.last_success_resume_time.tv_sec,
> 429 | suspend_stats.last_success_resume_time.tv_nsec);
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | long int
> kernel/power/main.c: In function 'suspend_stats_show':
> kernel/power/main.c:528:62: warning: format '%llu' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'long int' [-Wformat=]
> 528 | seq_printf(s, "last_success_resume_time:\t%-llu.%llu\n",
> | ~~~^
> | |
> | long long unsigned int
> | %lu
> 529 | suspend_stats.last_success_resume_time.tv_sec,
> 530 | suspend_stats.last_success_resume_time.tv_nsec);
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | |
> | long int
>
>
> vim +427 kernel/power/main.c
>
> 423
> 424 static ssize_t last_success_resume_time_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> 425 struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> 426 {
> > 427 return sprintf(buf, "%llu.%llu\n",
> 428 suspend_stats.last_success_resume_time.tv_sec,
> 429 suspend_stats.last_success_resume_time.tv_nsec);
> 430 }
> 431 static struct kobj_attribute last_success_resume_time =
> 432 __ATTR_RO(last_success_resume_time);
> 433
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists