linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the asm-generic, block and tip trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHC9VhT1W_fXuJMPmEAVBY7ew_EymH9EE-bJ397yp_H216mp0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 28 Oct 2023 11:29:54 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with the
 asm-generic, block and tip trees

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:50 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the security tree got conflicts in:
>
>   arch/alpha/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>   arch/arm/tools/syscall.tbl
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd.h
>   arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h
>   arch/m68k/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>   arch/microblaze/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>   arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n32.tbl
>   arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_n64.tbl
>   arch/mips/kernel/syscalls/syscall_o32.tbl
>   arch/parisc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>   arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>   arch/sh/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>   arch/sparc/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>   arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl
>   arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl
>   arch/xtensa/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
>   include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
>
> between commits:
>
>   2fd0ebad27bc ("arch: Reserve map_shadow_stack() syscall number for all architectures")
>   9f6c532f59b2 ("futex: Add sys_futex_wake()")
>   cb8c4312afca ("futex: Add sys_futex_wait()")
>   0f4b5f972216 ("futex: Add sys_futex_requeue()")
>
> from the asm-generic, block and tip trees and commit:
>
>   6d54f25e4605 ("LSM: wireup Linux Security Module syscalls")
>
> from the security tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks Stephen, those changes look correct to me, I'll update the LSM
tree once the asm-generic, block, and tip tree changes make their way
to Linus.

-- 
paul-moore.com