[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2iUrfnuGQ9eFTr=NTeC6KSUPC37Qji5_g5MWejmXnXO3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 02:56:30 -0400
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] x86/stackprotector/64: Convert stack protector
to normal percpu variable
On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 9:26 PM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on tip/master]
> [also build test ERROR on next-20231027]
> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core dennis-percpu/for-next linus/master tip/auto-latest v6.6-rc7]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Brian-Gerst/x86-stackprotector-32-Remove-stack-protector-test-script/20231027-000533
> base: tip/master
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231026160100.195099-6-brgerst%40gmail.com
> patch subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] x86/stackprotector/64: Convert stack protector to normal percpu variable
> config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231029/202310290927.2MuJJdu9-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231029/202310290927.2MuJJdu9-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310290927.2MuJJdu9-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> Unsupported relocation type: unknown type rel type name (42)
Clang is generating a new relocation type (R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX)
that the relocs tool doesn't know about. This is supposed to allow
movq __stack_chk_guard@...PCREL(%rip), %rax
movq %gs:(%rax), %rax
to be relaxed to
leaq __stack_chk_guard(%rip), %rax
movq %gs:(%rax), %rax
But why is clang doing this instead of what GCC does?
movq %gs:__stack_chk_guard(%rip), %rax
Brian Gerst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists