lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231030213146.GA2490536-robh@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 16:31:46 -0500 From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/30] Add support for QMC HDLC, framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 12:32:15PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:00:51 +0200 Herve Codina wrote: > > > Which way will those patches go? Via some FSL SoC tree? > > > > This series seems mature now. > > What is the plan next in order to have it applied ? > > > > Don't hesitate to tell me if you prefer split series. > > FWIW we are happy to take the drivers/net/ parts if there is no hard > dependency. But there's no point taking that unless the SoC bits > also go in for 6.7. > > Li Yang, what are your expectations WRT merging this series? I think it is too late for SoC stuff for 6.7. I picked up binding patches 6, 7, and 8 because 6 and 7 are the same as an additionalProperties fix I have in my tree. As 8 depends on them, I just picked it up too. Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists