linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] nfsd changes for v6.7 (early)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgyD3=63P=xewgmzSxcMmfj9LPakdVBDWnzR1EwUUOctQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 13:42:30 -1000
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc:     Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] nfsd changes for v6.7 (early)

On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 13:21, Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> Do you need a refreshed PR with the testing bit removed,
> or can you live with Neil or me sending a subsequent
> fix-up later in the merge window?

Oh, I've pulled it, I just haven't pushed out my recent merges yet.

I realize that my complaints are nit-picky and they don't hold up pull
requests. It's just that bad Kconfig questions are a pet peeve of
mine.

But being a pet peeve doesn't make it a showstopper..

          Linus