lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZT9qENE9fE3Z0KCW@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 16:32:16 +0800
From:   Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
Cc:     Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>,
        Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fpga: remove module reference counting from core
 components

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 05:29:27PM +0200, Marco Pagani wrote:
> Remove unnecessary module reference counting from the core components
> of the subsystem. Low-level driver modules cannot be removed before
> core modules since they use their exported symbols.

Could you help show the code for this conclusion?

This is different from what I remember, a module cannot be removed when
its exported symbols are being used by other modules. IOW, the core
modules cannot be removed when there exist related low-level driver
modules. But the low-level driver modules could be removed freely
without other protecting mechanism.

> 
> For more context, refer to this thread:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fpga/ZS6hhlvjUcqyv8zL@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050
> 
> Other changes:
> 
> In  __fpga_bridge_get(): do a (missing ?) get_device() and bind the

I think get_device() is in (of)_fpga_bridge_get() -> class_find_device()
and put_device() correspond to it.

But the code style here is rather misleading, the put_device() should be
moved out to (of)_fpga_bridge_get().

> image to the bridge only after the mutex has been acquired.

This is good to me.

> 
> In __fpga_mgr_get(): do a get_device(). Currently, get_device() is
> called when allocating an image in fpga_image_info_alloc().
> However, since there are still two (of_)fpga_mgr_get() functions
> exposed by the core, I think they should behave as expected.

Same as fpga bridge.

> 
> In fpga_region_get() / fpga_region_put(): call get_device() before
> acquiring the mutex and put_device() after having released the mutex
> to avoid races.

Could you help elaborate more about the race?

Thanks,
Yilun

> 
> Fixes: 654ba4cc0f3e ("fpga manager: ensure lifetime with of_fpga_mgr_get")
> Signed-off-by: Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
>  drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c    |  8 +-------
>  drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c | 14 ++++----------
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
> index a024be2b84e2..3bcc9c9849c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-bridge.c
> @@ -58,30 +58,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_bridge_disable);
>  static struct fpga_bridge *__fpga_bridge_get(struct device *dev,
>  					     struct fpga_image_info *info)
>  {
> -	struct fpga_bridge *bridge;
> -	int ret = -ENODEV;
> -
> -	bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
> +	struct fpga_bridge *bridge = to_fpga_bridge(dev);
>  
> -	bridge->info = info;
> +	get_device(dev);
>  
>  	if (!mutex_trylock(&bridge->mutex)) {
> -		ret = -EBUSY;
> -		goto err_dev;
> +		dev_dbg(dev, "%s: FPGA Bridge already in use\n", __func__);
> +		put_device(dev);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!try_module_get(dev->parent->driver->owner))
> -		goto err_ll_mod;
> +	bridge->info = info;
>  
>  	dev_dbg(&bridge->dev, "get\n");
>  
>  	return bridge;
> -
> -err_ll_mod:
> -	mutex_unlock(&bridge->mutex);
> -err_dev:
> -	put_device(dev);
> -	return ERR_PTR(ret);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -93,7 +84,7 @@ static struct fpga_bridge *__fpga_bridge_get(struct device *dev,
>   * Return:
>   * * fpga_bridge struct pointer if successful.
>   * * -EBUSY if someone already has a reference to the bridge.
> - * * -ENODEV if @np is not an FPGA Bridge or can't take parent driver refcount.
> + * * -ENODEV if @np is not an FPGA Bridge.
>   */
>  struct fpga_bridge *of_fpga_bridge_get(struct device_node *np,
>  				       struct fpga_image_info *info)
> @@ -146,7 +137,6 @@ void fpga_bridge_put(struct fpga_bridge *bridge)
>  	dev_dbg(&bridge->dev, "put\n");
>  
>  	bridge->info = NULL;
> -	module_put(bridge->dev.parent->driver->owner);
>  	mutex_unlock(&bridge->mutex);
>  	put_device(&bridge->dev);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
> index 06651389c592..6c355eafd18f 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-mgr.c
> @@ -670,14 +670,9 @@ static struct fpga_manager *__fpga_mgr_get(struct device *dev)
>  
>  	mgr = to_fpga_manager(dev);
>  
> -	if (!try_module_get(dev->parent->driver->owner))
> -		goto err_dev;
> +	get_device(&mgr->dev);
>  
>  	return mgr;
> -
> -err_dev:
> -	put_device(dev);
> -	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>  }
>  
>  static int fpga_mgr_dev_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
> @@ -727,7 +722,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_fpga_mgr_get);
>   */
>  void fpga_mgr_put(struct fpga_manager *mgr)
>  {
> -	module_put(mgr->dev.parent->driver->owner);
>  	put_device(&mgr->dev);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_mgr_put);
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c b/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c
> index b364a929425c..c299956cafdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/fpga-region.c
> @@ -41,22 +41,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_region_class_find);
>   * Return:
>   * * fpga_region struct if successful.
>   * * -EBUSY if someone already has a reference to the region.
> - * * -ENODEV if can't take parent driver module refcount.
>   */
>  static struct fpga_region *fpga_region_get(struct fpga_region *region)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &region->dev;
>  
> +	get_device(dev);
> +
>  	if (!mutex_trylock(&region->mutex)) {
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "%s: FPGA Region already in use\n", __func__);
> -		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> -	}
> -
> -	get_device(dev);
> -	if (!try_module_get(dev->parent->driver->owner)) {
>  		put_device(dev);
> -		mutex_unlock(&region->mutex);
> -		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
>  	}
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "get\n");
> @@ -75,9 +70,8 @@ static void fpga_region_put(struct fpga_region *region)
>  
>  	dev_dbg(dev, "put\n");
>  
> -	module_put(dev->parent->driver->owner);
> -	put_device(dev);
>  	mutex_unlock(&region->mutex);
> +	put_device(dev);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ