linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: document the SM8650 PAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5e8b3ef3-441e-4d0e-94b4-6a6658ba67d9@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 10:31:03 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     neil.armstrong@...aro.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8550-pas: document
 the SM8650 PAS

On 30/10/2023 09:29, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Ok, I fixed all that
> 
>>
>>> +  - if:
>>> +      properties:
>>> +        compatible:
>>> +          enum:
>>> +            - qcom,sm8650-mpss-pas
>>> +    then:
>>
>> I am not sure if keeping it in the same binding as sm8550 avoids that
>> much duplication.
> 
> Yes it does, 70% is the bindings would be the same, still if it's still preferable I can duplicate.
> 

Then let's keep how you propose - in one binding.

Best regards,
Krzysztof