[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ed75fa4-6b49-4fd2-a907-8619ca19a8b8@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 12:27:07 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-x86 tree
On 10/30/23 11:05, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> @Paolo and @Sean, does that make sense and is the series for v6.7 or
> just already in -next for v6.8?
It's for 6.8. Thanks for the fixup!
Paolo
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> index 94bc478c26f3..a4c194b0b22c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> @@ -272,17 +272,7 @@ static int kvm_gmem_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>
> static struct file *kvm_gmem_get_file(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> {
> - struct file *file;
> -
> - rcu_read_lock();
> -
> - file = rcu_dereference(slot->gmem.file);
> - if (file && !get_file_rcu(file))
> - file = NULL;
> -
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> -
> - return file;
> + return get_file_active(&slot->gmem.file);
> }
>
> static struct file_operations kvm_gmem_fops = {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists