linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: add dt-bindings for Marvell COM Express boards

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <02040f13-22ae-4ea5-9119-99bf778c27bf@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:31:38 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        andrew@...n.ch, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
        sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, pali@...nel.org,
        mrkiko.rs@...il.com, chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     cyuval@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: add dt-bindings for
 Marvell COM Express boards

On 29/10/2023 18:48, Elad Nachman wrote:
> From: Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>
> 

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "dt-bindings for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.

> Add dt bindings for:
> CN9130 COM Express CPU module
> CN9131 COM Express CPU module
> AC5X RD COM Express Type 7 carrier board.
> AC5X RD COM Express board with a CN9131 COM Express Type 7 CPU module.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml        | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  .../bindings/arm/marvell/marvell,ac5.yaml         | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
> index 52d78521e412..7e0ac5110eef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
> @@ -60,4 +60,19 @@ properties:
>            - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad
>            - const: marvell,armada-ap807
>  
> +      - description: Armada CN9130 SoC without external CP as COM Express CPU module
> +        items:
> +          - const: marvell,cn9130-cpu-module

How CPU module can be used alone?

> +          - const: marvell,cn9130
> +          - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad
> +          - const: marvell,armada-ap807
> +
> +      - description: Armada CN9131 SoC with one external CP as COM Express CPU module
> +        items:
> +          - const: marvell,cn9131-cpu-module
> +          - const: marvell,cn9131
> +          - const: marvell,cn9130
> +          - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad
> +          - const: marvell,armada-ap807
> +
>  additionalProperties: true
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/marvell,ac5.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/marvell,ac5.yaml
> index 8960fb8b2b2f..734e1716a3e9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/marvell,ac5.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/marvell,ac5.yaml
> @@ -27,6 +27,20 @@ properties:
>            - const: marvell,ac5x
>            - const: marvell,ac5
>  
> +      - description: Alleycat5X (98DX35xx) Reference Design as COM Express Carrier
> +        items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - marvell,rd-ac5x-carrier
> +          - const: marvell,ac5x
> +
> +      - description:
> +           Alleycat5X (98DX35xx) Reference Design as COM Express Carrier plus
> +           Armada CN9131 COM Express CPU module
> +        items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - marvell,rd-ac5x-carrier-with-cn9131
> +          - const: marvell,ac5x

You never responded to me concerns, so I still do not know what's this.
This claims it has CN9131, but compatibles are missing.

Can anyone help us understand why AC5 has CN9130 but these are in
different files?

Best regards,
Krzysztof