[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <302a0c90-cc5a-41c3-8004-f96e9586ccf4@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:15:19 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Miclaus, Antoniu" <Antoniu.Miclaus@...log.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] hwmon: ltc2991: add driver support
On 10/30/23 00:59, Miclaus, Antoniu wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 01:33:13PM +0300, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
>>> Add support for LTC2991 Octal I2C Voltage, Current, and Temperature
>>> Monitor.
>>>
>>> The LTC2991 is used to monitor system temperatures, voltages and
>>> currents. Through the I2C serial interface, the eight monitors can
>>> individually measure supply voltages and can be paired for
>>> differential measurements of current sense resistors or temperature
>>> sensing transistors. Additional measurements include internal
>>> temperature and internal VCC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>
>>
>> Applied. I do have one comment (see below) about code which
>> I would normally reject, but I am getting tired.
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>> +
>>> +struct ltc2991_state {
>>> + struct device *dev;
>>
>> It is completely pointless to have a reference to dev in struct
>> ltc2991_state because it is only used in the init function and
>> dereferenced six times there. It would have been much easier to
>> pass it as argument to that function. That would also have avoided
>> the wrong assumption or expectation that it is needed/used elsewhere.
>>
>> Guenter
> Sorry for the misunderstanding. I took as reference some old driver
> implementations from the mainline kernel.
>
You can find examples for pretty much everything in the kernel, including
pretty much everything bad and pointless.
> Is it fine if I do a follow-up patch on this subject in the near future?
>
If you wish. I already accepted your patch.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists