[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231030142751.49913-1-nicymimz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:27:47 +0300
From: Nancy Nyambura <nicymimz@...il.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: nicydaniels@...il.com, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
Nancy Nyambura <nicymimz@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] Staging: rts5208: Replace strncpy() with strscpy()
Warning found by checkpath.pl
I replaced strncpy with strscpy because strscpy is suitable when the destination buffer is NUL-terminated, which is often the case when copying strings. Strscpy ensures that the destination buffer is properly NUL-terminated without padding. In the code, the objective is to copy a string (inquiry_string) to the buf buffer, and it's likely that the buf buffer is NUL-terminated since it is handling a string. Strscpy_pad is used when you have afixed-size buffer, and you want to copy a string into it while ensuring the remaining space is padded with a specific character (like '\0') hence not appropriate for this context.
Signed-off-by: Nancy Nyambura <nicymimz@...il.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Explain why strscpy and not strscpy_pad
drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c
index 08bd768ad34d..52324b8ebbc7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rts5208/rtsx_scsi.c
@@ -523,7 +523,7 @@ static int inquiry(struct scsi_cmnd *srb, struct rtsx_chip *chip)
if (sendbytes > 8) {
memcpy(buf, inquiry_buf, 8);
- strncpy(buf + 8, inquiry_string, sendbytes - 8);
+ strscpy(buf + 8, inquiry_string, sendbytes - 8);
if (pro_formatter_flag) {
/* Additional Length */
buf[4] = 0x33;
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists