[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaPqg4X5HrLn_Nt3_FYNtd0bL4wAKWFfRXStvX9bWagYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:29:28 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Bump min packet size
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 1:51 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> So, what Florian was asking is whether the conduit interface is not
> doing its expected job properly. You clarified that the problem is big
> rather than small packets, but we still need an explanation for the
> existing __skb_put_padto() call, given that it seems that it was placed
> there due to a misunderstanding rather than due to an explicit need for
> an exceptional case.
Hm Deng added that and it was because the same was needed for
some other tagger IIRC, let's see what he says.
I will do some tests to just remove it and see what happens.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists