linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: boot: Support Flat Image Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 15:35:34 +0000
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@...ts.denx.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
        Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: boot: Support Flat Image Tree

On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 05:46:12AM +1300, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Masahiro,
> 
> Sure, but that is a separate issue, isn't it? We already support
> various boot targets in arm64 but not one that includes the DTs, so
> far as I can see. The old arm 'uImage' target is pretty out-of-date
> now.

Does that mean it can be removed? ;)

I've NAK'd FIT support on 32-bit Arm in the past, and I remain of the
opinion that boot loader specific packaging of the kernel should not
be in the kernel but should be external to it - even more so given the
multi-platform nature of 32-bit Arm kernels.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!