| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <836a6052-ad23-4a5f-9eb5-a7b5361b568c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 17:01:16 +0100
From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
<nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@....com>,
Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@....com>,
"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS"
<amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2@...wei.com>,
Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>,
Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@....com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@....com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Jack Xiao <Jack.Xiao@....com>,
Jonathan Kim <jonathan.kim@....com>,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lang Yu <Lang.Yu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm/exec: Pass in initial # of objects
Am 30.10.23 um 14:38 schrieb Rob Clark:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 1:05 AM Christian König
> <christian.koenig@....com> wrote:
>> Am 27.10.23 um 18:58 schrieb Rob Clark:
>>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>>>
>>> In cases where the # is known ahead of time, it is silly to do the table
>>> resize dance.
>> Ah, yes that was my initial implementation as well, but I ditched that
>> because nobody actually used it.
>>
>> One comment below.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c | 4 ++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c | 4 ++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c | 4 ++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c | 2 +-
>>> include/drm/drm_exec.h | 2 +-
>>> 8 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
>>> index efdb1c48f431..d27ca8f61929 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
>>> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_parser_init(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
>>> }
>>>
>>> amdgpu_sync_create(&p->sync);
>>> - drm_exec_init(&p->exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT);
>>> + drm_exec_init(&p->exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT, 0);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c
>>> index 720011019741..796fa6f1420b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_csa.c
>>> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int amdgpu_map_static_csa(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>>> struct drm_exec exec;
>>> int r;
>>>
>>> - drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT);
>>> + drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT, 0);
>>> drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
>>> r = amdgpu_vm_lock_pd(vm, &exec, 0);
>>> if (likely(!r))
>>> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ int amdgpu_unmap_static_csa(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct amdgpu_vm *vm,
>>> struct drm_exec exec;
>>> int r;
>>>
>>> - drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT);
>>> + drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT, 0);
>>> drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
>>> r = amdgpu_vm_lock_pd(vm, &exec, 0);
>>> if (likely(!r))
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>>> index ca4d2d430e28..16f1715148ad 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gem.c
>>> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void amdgpu_gem_object_close(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>>> struct drm_exec exec;
>>> long r;
>>>
>>> - drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES);
>>> + drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES, 0);
>>> drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
>>> r = drm_exec_prepare_obj(&exec, &bo->tbo.base, 1);
>>> drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec);
>>> @@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ int amdgpu_gem_va_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>>> }
>>>
>>> drm_exec_init(&exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT |
>>> - DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES);
>>> + DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES, 0);
>>> drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
>>> if (gobj) {
>>> r = drm_exec_lock_obj(&exec, gobj);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c
>>> index b6015157763a..3c351941701e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c
>>> @@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ int amdgpu_mes_ctx_map_meta_data(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>
>>> amdgpu_sync_create(&sync);
>>>
>>> - drm_exec_init(&exec, 0);
>>> + drm_exec_init(&exec, 0, 0);
>>> drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
>>> r = drm_exec_lock_obj(&exec,
>>> &ctx_data->meta_data_obj->tbo.base);
>>> @@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ int amdgpu_mes_ctx_unmap_meta_data(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>> struct drm_exec exec;
>>> long r;
>>>
>>> - drm_exec_init(&exec, 0);
>>> + drm_exec_init(&exec, 0, 0);
>>> drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) {
>>> r = drm_exec_lock_obj(&exec,
>>> &ctx_data->meta_data_obj->tbo.base);
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
>>> index 5d2809de4517..27d11c20d148 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_exec.c
>>> @@ -69,16 +69,25 @@ static void drm_exec_unlock_all(struct drm_exec *exec)
>>> * drm_exec_init - initialize a drm_exec object
>>> * @exec: the drm_exec object to initialize
>>> * @flags: controls locking behavior, see DRM_EXEC_* defines
>>> + * @nr: the initial # of objects
>>> *
>>> * Initialize the object and make sure that we can track locked objects.
>>> + *
>>> + * If nr is non-zero then it is used as the initial objects table size.
>>> + * In either case, the table will grow (be re-allocated) on demand.
>>> */
>>> -void drm_exec_init(struct drm_exec *exec, uint32_t flags)
>>> +void drm_exec_init(struct drm_exec *exec, uint32_t flags, unsigned nr)
>>> {
>>> + size_t sz = PAGE_SIZE;
>>> +
>>> + if (nr)
>>> + sz = (size_t)nr * sizeof(void *);
>>> +
>>> exec->flags = flags;
>>> - exec->objects = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + exec->objects = kmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL);
>> Please use k*v*malloc() here since we can't predict how large that will be.
> or __GFP_NOWARN? If userspace (or kasan) is cheeky and asks for ~0
> objects, we should probably just fail?
Oh, good point! If this value is controlled by userspace we must be much
more careful.
Instead of __GFP_NOWARN or any other workaround we should use
kvmalloc_array() here.
Maybe turn the code upside down, in other words something like this here:
if (!nr)
nr = PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(void *);
exec->objects = kvmalloc_array(nr, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
exec->max_objects = exec->objects ? nr : 0;
Regards,
Christian.
>
> BR,
> -R
>
>> With that fixed the patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König
>> <christian.koenig@....com>.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> /* If allocation here fails, just delay that till the first use */
>>> - exec->max_objects = exec->objects ? PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(void *) : 0;
>>> + exec->max_objects = exec->objects ? sz / sizeof(void *) : 0;
>>> exec->num_objects = 0;
>>> exec->contended = DRM_EXEC_DUMMY;
>>> exec->prelocked = NULL;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.c
>>> index 19024ce21fbb..f5930cc0b3fb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_exec.c
>>> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ nouveau_exec_job_submit(struct nouveau_job *job)
>>>
>>> nouveau_uvmm_lock(uvmm);
>>> drm_exec_init(exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT |
>>> - DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES);
>>> + DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES, 0);
>>> drm_exec_until_all_locked(exec) {
>>> struct drm_gpuva *va;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
>>> index aae780e4a4aa..3a9331a1c830 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_uvmm.c
>>> @@ -1288,7 +1288,7 @@ nouveau_uvmm_bind_job_submit(struct nouveau_job *job)
>>> }
>>>
>>> drm_exec_init(exec, DRM_EXEC_INTERRUPTIBLE_WAIT |
>>> - DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES);
>>> + DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES, 0);
>>> drm_exec_until_all_locked(exec) {
>>> list_for_each_op(op, &bind_job->ops) {
>>> struct drm_gpuva_op *va_op;
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_exec.h b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
>>> index b5bf0b6da791..f1a66c048721 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_exec.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_exec.h
>>> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static inline bool drm_exec_is_contended(struct drm_exec *exec)
>>> return !!exec->contended;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -void drm_exec_init(struct drm_exec *exec, uint32_t flags);
>>> +void drm_exec_init(struct drm_exec *exec, uint32_t flags, unsigned nr);
>>> void drm_exec_fini(struct drm_exec *exec);
>>> bool drm_exec_cleanup(struct drm_exec *exec);
>>> int drm_exec_lock_obj(struct drm_exec *exec, struct drm_gem_object *obj);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists