lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fX6EW+6ZpTkdqKJeeXPjgBiwAGyDLWJGAzoNF5DEYmViw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:30:58 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     zhaimingbing <zhaimingbing@...s.chinamobile.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tests:FIx spelling mistake "whic" to "which"

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 2:12 AM zhaimingbing
<zhaimingbing@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote:
>
> There is a spelling mistake, Please fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhaimingbing <zhaimingbing@...s.chinamobile.com>

Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>

Thanks,
Ian

> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/attr.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/attr.c b/tools/perf/tests/attr.c
> index 61186d0d1..97e1bdd6e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/attr.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/attr.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int test__attr(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __mayb
>         if (perf_pmus__num_core_pmus() > 1) {
>                 /*
>                  * TODO: Attribute tests hard code the PMU type. If there are >1
> -                * core PMU then each PMU will have a different type whic
> +                * core PMU then each PMU will have a different type which
>                  * requires additional support.
>                  */
>                 pr_debug("Skip test on hybrid systems");
> --
> 2.33.0
>
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ