[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7g6w7ofbhzbjvoday4a6ld5ww5tewfb6lgnc5hncnsfowbxi2w@tbym33zcaxrj>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:58:12 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] cxl/trace: Remove uuid from event trace known
events
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023, Ira Weiny wrote:
>The uuid printed in the well known events is redundant. The uuid
>defines what the event was.
>
>Remove the uuid from the known events and only report it in the generic
>event as it remains informative there.
>
>Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists