linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] refscale: Optimize process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 09:55:16 -0700
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refscale: Optimize process_durations()

On Sat, 28 Oct 2023, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

>process_durations() is not a hot path, but there is no good reason to
>iterate over and over the data already in 'buf'.
>
>Using a seq_buf saves some useless strcat() and the need of a temp buffer.
>Data is written directly at the correct place.

Makes sense.

Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>