[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <654135c4f3e0_2e75b2949e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:13:40 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
CC: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC v2 3/3] cxl/memdev: Register for and process CPER
events
Dan Williams wrote:
> Ira Weiny wrote:
> > If the firmware has configured CXL event support to be firmware first
> > the OS can process those events through CPER records. Matching memory
> > devices to the CPER records can be done via the serial number which is
> > part of the CPER record header.
> >
> > Detect firmware first, register a notifier callback for each memdev, and
> > trace events when they match a device registered.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> >
> [..]
>
> The changes requested in patch2 cover all of the comments I currently
> have on this patch, just one more cleanup below:
>
> > +#define CXL_EVENT_HDR_FLAGS_REC_SEVERITY GENMASK(1, 0)
> > +int cxl_cper_event_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct cxl_cper_notifier_data *nd = data;
> > + struct cxl_event_record_raw record = (struct cxl_event_record_raw) {
> > + .hdr.id = UUID_INIT(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
> > + };
>
> Just do:
>
> struct cxl_event_record_raw record = { 0 };
>
> ...and the compiler will take care of the rest as initializing any field
> automatically initializes everything else to zero.
Not quite sure what I was thinking.
This works better but I think I can avoid needing this initialization all
together by reworking the structures. For now I have made the change and
I'll see how it falls out.
Thanks,
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists