[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231031193109.018322397@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:31:09 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] eventfs: Fixing dynamic creation
This is really just putting together two eventfs patches that were
stepping on each other in conflicts. I decided to rip out the free_ei()
part into its own patch (as that was what was confliciting.
This series is just a combination of:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231031111325.50087cd8@gandalf.local.home/
and
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20231031113627.2edfa83f@gandalf.local.home/
With the stripped out free_ei() patch.
Steven Rostedt (Google) (3):
eventfs: Have a free_ei() that just frees the eventfs_inode
eventfs: Test for ei->is_freed when accessing ei->dentry
eventfs: Save ownership and mode
----
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
fs/tracefs/internal.h | 19 ++++-
2 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists