[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231101092347.01bc2eec@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 09:23:47 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the asm-generic
tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:09:08 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:05:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > arch/ia64/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture")
> >
> > from the asm-generic tree and commits:
> >
> > 9f6c532f59b2 ("futex: Add sys_futex_wake()")
> > cb8c4312afca ("futex: Add sys_futex_wait()")
> > 0f4b5f972216 ("futex: Add sys_futex_requeue()")
> >
> > from the block tree.
>
> These three commits are also in the tip tree.
>
> > I fixed it up (I just removed the file) and can carry the fix as
> > necessary.
This is now a conflict between the asm-generic tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists