linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 30 [drivers/cxl/core/cxl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cd18356e-51dc-4054-afbb-7f92a45833a7@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2023 16:36:26 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 30 [drivers/cxl/core/cxl_core.ko]

Hi Dan.

On 10/31/23 10:46, Dan Williams wrote:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> [CCing the CXL maintainers]
>>
>> On 31.10.23 06:04, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 10/29/23 22:33, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please do not add any material not destined to be merged before v6.7-rc1
>>>> into your linux-next included branches until after v6.7-rc1 has been
>>>> released.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20231027:
>>>
>>> when CONFIG_ACPI is not set (on various ARCH):
>>>
>>> ERROR: modpost: "pci_print_aer" [drivers/cxl/core/cxl_core.ko] undefined!
>>>
>>> Already fixed?
>>
>> Doesn't seem so, I saw that yesterday and today in my ppc64le builds for
>> Fedora (based on the Fedora rawhide config). Build log, in case anyone
>> cares:
>> https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@kernel-vanilla/next/fedora-38-ppc64le/06583955-next-next-all/builder-live.log.gz
>>
>> Seems 0day ran into this, too:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202310281921.W9lzomPk-lkp@intel.com/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202310290131.Z10R00pk-lkp@intel.com/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202310302206.Pkr5eBDi-lkp@intel.com/
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202310310457.5LusQqF6-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> Yes, apologies for the thrash. This fixes it for me. I will append this
> to the cxl/next branch:
> 

Works for me. Thanks.

> diff --git a/include/linux/aer.h b/include/linux/aer.h
> index f6ea2f57d808..3db310c19ab7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/aer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/aer.h
> @@ -43,16 +43,20 @@ struct aer_capability_regs {
>  #if defined(CONFIG_PCIEAER)
>  int pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity,
> +                   struct aer_capability_regs *aer);
>  #else
>  static inline int pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  {
>         return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  static inline int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev) { return 0; }
> +static inline void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity,
> +                                struct aer_capability_regs *aer)
> +{
> +}
>  #endif
>  
> -void pci_print_aer(struct pci_dev *dev, int aer_severity,
> -                   struct aer_capability_regs *aer);
>  int cper_severity_to_aer(int cper_severity);
>  void aer_recover_queue(int domain, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn,
>                        int severity, struct aer_capability_regs *aer_regs);

-- 
~Randy