linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Add compatible for BCM59054

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a0742798-982d-4461-9731-aac41fcf8be3@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2023 06:54:07 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Broadcom internal kernel review list 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Add compatible for
 BCM59054

On 30/10/2023 20:36, Artur Weber wrote:
> The BCM59054 MFD is fairly similar to the BCM59056, and will use
> the same driver. Add compatible and specify the allowed regulator
> nodes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml     | 125 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml
> index 6d6acc9fd312..5b5044867eca 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ maintainers:
>  properties:
>    compatible:
>      enum:
> +      - "brcm,bcm59054"

Where do you see syntax with quotes?

>        - "brcm,bcm59056"
>  
>    reg:
> @@ -24,43 +25,93 @@ properties:
>      type: object
>      description: Container node for regulators.
>  
> -    # The valid regulator node names for BCM59056 are:
> -    #   rfldo, camldo1, camldo2, simldo1, simldo2, sdldo, sdxldo,
> -    #   mmcldo1, mmcldo2, audldo, micldo, usbldo, vibldo,
> -    #   csr, iosr1, iosr2, msr, sdsr1, sdsr2, vsr,
> -    #   gpldo1, gpldo2, gpldo3, gpldo4, gpldo5, gpldo6,
> -    #   vbus
> -    patternProperties:
> -      "^(cam|sim|mmc)ldo[1-2]$":
> -        type: object
> -        $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> -        unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> -      "^(rf|sd|sdx|aud|mic|usb|vib)ldo$":
> -        type: object
> -        $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> -        unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> -      "^(c|m|v)sr$":
> -        type: object
> -        $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> -        unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> -      "^(io|sd)sr[1-2]$":
> -        type: object
> -        $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> -        unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> -      "^gpldo[1-6]$":
> -        type: object
> -        $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> -        unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> -    properties:
> -      "vbus":
> -        type: object
> -        $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> -        unevaluatedProperties: false
> +allOf:

No. We do not define properties in allOf:if: block. If there are just
few differences, define all at the top level and disallow few (foo-bar:
false). If there are more, just create separate bindings.



Best regards,
Krzysztof