linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: usb: add no-64-bit-support property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023103104-stamp-amniotic-369d@gregkh>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2023 06:54:34 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Naveen Kumar <mnkumar@...gle.com>
Cc:     Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, royluo@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: usb: add no-64-bit-support property

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 04:40:21AM +0000, Naveen Kumar wrote:
> From: Naveen Kumar M <mnkumar@...gle.com>
> 
> Add a new DT option to specify whether a host controller is able to
> support 64-bit DMA memory pointers
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar M <mnkumar@...gle.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml
> index 180a261c3e8f..20dc134004f3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-xhci.yaml
> @@ -25,6 +25,10 @@ properties:
>      description: Set if the controller has broken port disable mechanism
>      type: boolean
>  
> +  quirk-no-64-bit-support:
> +    description: Set if the xHC doesn't support 64-bit DMA memory pointers
> +    type: boolean
> +
>    imod-interval-ns:
>      description: Interrupt moderation interval
>      default: 5000
> -- 
> 2.42.0.820.g83a721a137-goog
> 
> 

You did not send this patch to all of the relevant
maintainers/reviewers, why not?

please always use scripts/get_maintainer.pl on your patches.

thanks,

greg k-h