| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <7506b682-3be3-fcd0-4bb4-c1db48f609a2@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 16:01:13 +0800
From: Hou Tao <houtao@...weicloud.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, "houtao1@...wei.com" <houtao1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [bpf] c930472552:
WARNING:at_kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:#bpf_mem_alloc_init
Hi,
On 10/30/2023 10:11 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> hi, Hou Tao,
>
> we noticed a WARN_ONCE added in this commit was hit in our tests. FYI.
>
>
> Hello,
>
> kernel test robot noticed "WARNING:at_kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:#bpf_mem_alloc_init" on:
>
> commit: c930472552022bd09aab3cd946ba3f243070d5c7 ("bpf: Ensure unit_size is matched with slab cache object size")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> [test failed on linus/master ffc253263a1375a65fa6c9f62a893e9767fbebfa]
> [test failed on linux-next/master c503e3eec382ac708ee7adf874add37b77c5d312]
>
> in testcase: boot
>
> compiler: gcc-12
> test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G
>
> (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
>
>
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> | | b1d53958b6 | c930472552 |
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
> | WARNING:at_kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:#bpf_mem_alloc_init | 0 | 14 |
> | EIP:bpf_mem_alloc_init | 0 | 14 |
> +-------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202310302113.9f8fe705-oliver.sang@intel.com
>
>
> [ 32.249545][ T1] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 32.250152][ T1] bpf_mem_cache[0]: unexpected object size 128, expect 96
> [ 32.250953][ T1] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:500 bpf_mem_alloc_init (kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:500 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:579)
> [ 32.252065][ T1] Modules linked in:
> [ 32.252548][ T1] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 6.5.0-12679-gc93047255202 #1
> [ 32.253767][ T1] EIP: bpf_mem_alloc_init (kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:500 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:579)
> [ 32.254439][ T1] Code: 30 e8 7e 22 04 00 8b 56 20 39 d0 74 24 80 3d 18 c0 cc c2 00 75 3b c6 05 18 c0 cc c2 01 52 50 53 68 df 53 57 c2 e8 47 70 ef ff <0f> 0b 83 c4 10 eb 20 43 83 c6 74 83 fb 0b 0f 85 6a ff ff ff 8b 45
Thanks for the report. I also could reproduce the warning in v6.6 by
following the reproducing steps in the link below.
According the reproduce job, it seems that the kernel is built for i386
(make HOSTCC=gcc-12 CC=gcc-12 ARCH=i386 olddefconfig prepare
modules_prepare bzImage) and in .config CONFIG_SLAB instead of
CONFIG_SLUB is enabled, I will check whether or not these two setups
make any thing being different.
Regards,
Tao
> All code
> ========
> 0: 30 e8 xor %ch,%al
> 2: 7e 22 jle 0x26
> 4: 04 00 add $0x0,%al
> 6: 8b 56 20 mov 0x20(%rsi),%edx
> 9: 39 d0 cmp %edx,%eax
> b: 74 24 je 0x31
> d: 80 3d 18 c0 cc c2 00 cmpb $0x0,-0x3d333fe8(%rip) # 0xffffffffc2ccc02c
> 14: 75 3b jne 0x51
> 16: c6 05 18 c0 cc c2 01 movb $0x1,-0x3d333fe8(%rip) # 0xffffffffc2ccc035
> 1d: 52 push %rdx
> 1e: 50 push %rax
> 1f: 53 push %rbx
> 20: 68 df 53 57 c2 push $0xffffffffc25753df
> 25: e8 47 70 ef ff call 0xffffffffffef7071
> 2a:* 0f 0b ud2 <-- trapping instruction
> 2c: 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%esp
> 2f: eb 20 jmp 0x51
> 31: 43 83 c6 74 rex.XB add $0x74,%r14d
> 35: 83 fb 0b cmp $0xb,%ebx
> 38: 0f 85 6a ff ff ff jne 0xffffffffffffffa8
> 3e: 8b .byte 0x8b
> 3f: 45 rex.RB
>
> Code starting with the faulting instruction
> ===========================================
> 0: 0f 0b ud2
> 2: 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%esp
> 5: eb 20 jmp 0x27
> 7: 43 83 c6 74 rex.XB add $0x74,%r14d
> b: 83 fb 0b cmp $0xb,%ebx
> e: 0f 85 6a ff ff ff jne 0xffffffffffffff7e
> 14: 8b .byte 0x8b
> 15: 45 rex.RB
> [ 32.256641][ T1] EAX: 00000037 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000002 EDX: 80000002
> [ 32.257402][ T1] ESI: fefbda30 EDI: da953a30 EBP: c3d49ef0 ESP: c3d49ec0
> [ 32.258176][ T1] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010286
> [ 32.259000][ T1] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 02dd5000 CR4: 000406d0
> [ 32.259768][ T1] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
> [ 32.260526][ T1] DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400
> [ 32.261021][ T1] Call Trace:
> [ 32.261376][ T1] ? show_regs (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:479 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:465)
> [ 32.261835][ T1] ? bpf_mem_alloc_init (kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:500 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:579)
> [ 32.262395][ T1] ? __warn (kernel/panic.c:673)
> [ 32.262840][ T1] ? report_bug (lib/bug.c:201 lib/bug.c:219)
> [ 32.263327][ T1] ? bpf_mem_alloc_init (kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:500 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:579)
> [ 32.263884][ T1] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250)
> [ 32.264368][ T1] ? handle_bug (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:237)
> [ 32.264833][ T1] ? exc_invalid_op (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:258 (discriminator 1))
> [ 32.265333][ T1] ? handle_exception (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:1056)
> [ 32.265903][ T1] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250)
> [ 32.266392][ T1] ? bpf_mem_alloc_init (kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:500 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:579)
> [ 32.266982][ T1] ? exc_overflow (arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:250)
> [ 32.267476][ T1] ? bpf_mem_alloc_init (kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:500 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:579)
> [ 32.268050][ T1] ? irq_work_init_threads (kernel/bpf/core.c:2919)
> [ 32.268610][ T1] bpf_global_ma_init (kernel/bpf/core.c:2923)
> [ 32.269142][ T1] do_one_initcall (init/main.c:1232)
> [ 32.269657][ T1] ? debug_smp_processor_id (lib/smp_processor_id.c:61)
> [ 32.270243][ T1] ? rcu_is_watching (include/linux/context_tracking.h:122 kernel/rcu/tree.c:699)
> [ 32.270770][ T1] do_initcalls (init/main.c:1293 init/main.c:1310)
> [ 32.271275][ T1] kernel_init_freeable (init/main.c:1549)
> [ 32.271841][ T1] ? rest_init (init/main.c:1429)
> [ 32.272324][ T1] kernel_init (init/main.c:1439)
> [ 32.272785][ T1] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:153)
> [ 32.273272][ T1] ? rest_init (init/main.c:1429)
> [ 32.273752][ T1] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:741)
> [ 32.274272][ T1] entry_INT80_32 (arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S:947)
> [ 32.274803][ T1] irq event stamp: 16968005
> [ 32.275293][ T1] hardirqs last enabled at (16968013): console_unlock (arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:26 arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:67 arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:127 kernel/printk/printk.c:347 kernel/printk/printk.c:2720 kernel/printk/printk.c:3039)
> [ 32.276277][ T1] hardirqs last disabled at (16968022): console_unlock (kernel/printk/printk.c:345 kernel/printk/printk.c:2720 kernel/printk/printk.c:3039)
> [ 32.277242][ T1] softirqs last enabled at (16967866): __do_softirq (arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:27 kernel/softirq.c:400 kernel/softirq.c:582)
> [ 32.278202][ T1] softirqs last disabled at (16967861): do_softirq_own_stack (arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:57 arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c:147)
> [ 32.279228][ T1] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> [ 32.280294][ T1] kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector initialized (mem pool available: 15783)
> [ 32.281276][ T1] debug_vm_pgtable: [debug_vm_pgtable ]: Validating architecture page table helpers
> [ 32.285847][ T74] kmemleak: Automatic memory scanning thread started
> [ 32.290289][ T1] UBI error: cannot create "ubi" debugfs directory, error -2
> [ 32.291558][ T1] UBI error: cannot initialize UBI, error -2
>
>
>
> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231030/202310302113.9f8fe705-oliver.sang@intel.com
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists