[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3e9bcc3-e026-43d3-964c-5f5b51916782@leemhuis.info>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:11:06 +0100
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 30 [drivers/cxl/core/cxl_core.ko]
[CCing the CXL maintainers]
On 31.10.23 06:04, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/29/23 22:33, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>> Please do not add any material not destined to be merged before v6.7-rc1
>> into your linux-next included branches until after v6.7-rc1 has been
>> released.
>>
>> Changes since 20231027:
>
> when CONFIG_ACPI is not set (on various ARCH):
>
> ERROR: modpost: "pci_print_aer" [drivers/cxl/core/cxl_core.ko] undefined!
>
> Already fixed?
Doesn't seem so, I saw that yesterday and today in my ppc64le builds for
Fedora (based on the Fedora rawhide config). Build log, in case anyone
cares:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@kernel-vanilla/next/fedora-38-ppc64le/06583955-next-next-all/builder-live.log.gz
Seems 0day ran into this, too:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202310281921.W9lzomPk-lkp@intel.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202310290131.Z10R00pk-lkp@intel.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202310302206.Pkr5eBDi-lkp@intel.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202310310457.5LusQqF6-lkp@intel.com/
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists