linux-kernel - [kvm-unit-tests Patch v2 2/5] x86: pmu: Improve loop() to force to generate llc/branch misses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231031092921.2885109-3-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2023 17:29:18 +0800
From:   Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhang Xiong <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
        Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
        Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>,
        Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests Patch v2 2/5] x86: pmu: Improve loop() to force to generate llc/branch misses

Current loop() helper is a very simple adding loop function, it can't
garantee that LLC misses and branch misses would be always triggered in
the loop() running, especailly along with the larger and larger LLC size
and better and better branch predictor in new CPUs. In this situation
0 LLC/branch misses count would be seen more and more easily just like
what we see on Sapphire Rapids.

It's ambiguous to take 0 as a valid result in tests since we can't
confirm if the PMU function works correctly or it's just disabled.

So this patch improves current loop() function and introduces random
jump and clflush instructions to force to generate LLC and branch
misses. Since random jump and clflush instructions are involved, all
pre-defined valid count ranges are also update accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
---
 x86/pmu.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
index 0def28695c70..1df5794b7ef8 100644
--- a/x86/pmu.c
+++ b/x86/pmu.c
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 #include "libcflat.h"
 #include <stdint.h>
 
-#define N 1000000
+#define N 1000000ULL
 
 // These values match the number of instructions and branches in the
 // assembly block in check_emulated_instr().
@@ -28,25 +28,25 @@ typedef struct {
 struct pmu_event {
 	const char *name;
 	uint32_t unit_sel;
-	int min;
-	int max;
+	uint64_t min;
+	uint64_t max;
 } intel_gp_events[] = {
-	{"core cycles", 0x003c, 1*N, 50*N},
+	{"core cycles", 0x003c, 1*N, 500*N},
 	{"instructions", 0x00c0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
-	{"ref cycles", 0x013c, 1*N, 30*N},
-	{"llc references", 0x4f2e, 1, 2*N},
-	{"llc misses", 0x412e, 1, 1*N},
-	{"branches", 0x00c4, 1*N, 1.1*N},
-	{"branch misses", 0x00c5, 0, 0.1*N},
+	{"ref cycles", 0x013c, 1*N, 300*N},
+	{"llc references", 0x4f2e, 0.1*N, 2*N},
+	{"llc misses", 0x412e, 0.1*N, 1*N},
+	{"branches", 0x00c4, 3*N, 3.3*N},
+	{"branch misses", 0x00c5, 0.1*N, 0.3*N},
 }, amd_gp_events[] = {
-	{"core cycles", 0x0076, 1*N, 50*N},
+	{"core cycles", 0x0076, 1*N, 500*N},
 	{"instructions", 0x00c0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
-	{"branches", 0x00c2, 1*N, 1.1*N},
-	{"branch misses", 0x00c3, 0, 0.1*N},
+	{"branches", 0x00c2, 3*N, 3.3*N},
+	{"branch misses", 0x00c3, 0.1*N, 0.3*N},
 }, fixed_events[] = {
 	{"fixed 1", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
-	{"fixed 2", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 1, 1*N, 30*N},
-	{"fixed 3", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 2, 0.1*N, 30*N}
+	{"fixed 2", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 1, 1*N, 500*N},
+	{"fixed 3", MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR0 + 2, 0.1*N, 300*N},
 };
 
 char *buf;
@@ -56,10 +56,15 @@ static unsigned int gp_events_size;
 
 static inline void loop(void)
 {
-	unsigned long tmp, tmp2, tmp3;
+	unsigned long tmp, tmp2, tmp3, tmp4;
 
-	asm volatile("1: mov (%1), %2; add $64, %1; nop; nop; nop; nop; nop; nop; nop; loop 1b"
-			: "=c"(tmp), "=r"(tmp2), "=r"(tmp3): "0"(N), "1"(buf));
+	asm volatile("1: dec %0; jz 3f; mov (%1), %2; add $64, %1; nop; \n"
+		     "   rdrand %3; and $7, %3; jnz 2f; clflush (%1); jmp 1b\n"
+		     "2: nop; jmp 1b;"
+		     "3: nop"
+		     : "=c"(tmp), "=r"(tmp2), "=r"(tmp3), "=r"(tmp4)
+		     : "0"(N), "1"(buf)
+		     : "memory");
 
 }
 
@@ -202,7 +207,7 @@ static noinline void __measure(pmu_counter_t *evt, uint64_t count)
 
 static bool verify_event(uint64_t count, struct pmu_event *e)
 {
-	// printf("%d <= %ld <= %d\n", e->min, count, e->max);
+	// printf("%ld <= %ld <= %ld\n", e->min, count, e->max);
 	return count >= e->min  && count <= e->max;
 
 }
-- 
2.34.1