linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Devcoredump: fix use-after-free issue when releasing devcd device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2023 17:41:29 +0800
From:   Yu Wang <quic_yyuwang@...cinc.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <johannes@...solutions.net>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Devcoredump: fix use-after-free issue when releasing
 devcd device



On 10/31/2023 3:39 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:15:12PM +0800, Yu Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/2023 7:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:55:21PM -0700, Yu Wang wrote:
>>>> With sample code as below, it may hit use-after-free issue when
>>>> releasing devcd device.
>>>>
>>>>     struct my_coredump_state {
>>>>         struct completion dump_done;
>>>>         ...
>>>>     };
>>>>
>>>>     static void my_coredump_free(void *data)
>>>>     {
>>>>         struct my_coredump_state *dump_state = data;
>>>>         ...
>>>>         complete(&dump_state->dump_done);
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>>     static void my_dev_release(struct device *dev)
>>>>     {
>>>>         kfree(dev);
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>>     static void my_coredump()
>>>>     {
>>>>         struct my_coredump_state dump_state;
>>>>         struct device *new_device =
>>>>             kzalloc(sizeof(*new_device), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>
>>>>         ...
>>>>         new_device->release = my_dev_release;
>>>>         device_initialize(new_device);
>>>>         ...
>>>>         device_add(new_device);
>>>>         ...
>>>>         init_completion(&dump_state.dump_done);
>>>>         dev_coredumpm(new_device, NULL, &dump_state, datalen, GFP_KERNEL,
>>>>                       my_coredump_read, my_coredump_free);
>>>>         wait_for_completion(&dump_state.dump_done);
>>>>         device_del(new_device);
>>>>         put_device(new_device);
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>> In devcoredump framework, devcd_dev_release() will be called when
>>>> releasing the devcd device, it will call the free() callback first
>>>> and try to delete the symlink in sysfs directory of the failing device.
>>>> Eventhough it has checked 'devcd->failing_dev->kobj.sd' before that,
>>>> there is no mechanism to ensure it's still available when accessing
>>>> it in kernfs_find_ns(), refer to the diagram as below:
>>>>
>>>>     Thread A was waiting for 'dump_state.dump_done' at #A-1-2 after
>>>>     calling dev_coredumpm().
>>>>     When thread B calling devcd->free() at #B-2-1, it wakes up
>>>>     thread A from point #A-1-2, which will call device_del() to
>>>>     delete the device.
>>>>     If #B-2-2 comes before #A-3-1, but #B-4 comes after #A-4, it
>>>>     will hit use-after-free issue when trying to access
>>>>     'devcd->failing_dev->kobj.sd'.
>>>>
>>>>     #A-1-1: dev_coredumpm()
>>>>       #A-1-2: wait_for_completion(&dump_state.dump_done)
>>>>       #A-1-3: device_del()
>>>>         #A-2: kobject_del()
>>>>           #A-3-1: sysfs_remove_dir() --> set kobj->sd=NULL
>>>>           #A-3-2: kernfs_put()
>>>>             #A-4: kmem_cache_free() --> free kobj->sd
>>>>
>>>>     #B-1: devcd_dev_release()
>>>>       #B-2-1: devcd->free(devcd->data)
>>>>       #B-2-2: check devcd->failing_dev->kobj.sd
>>>>       #B-2-3: sysfs_delete_link()
>>>>         #B-3: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns()
>>>>           #B-4: kernfs_find_ns() --> access devcd->failing_dev->kobj.sd
>>>>
>>>> To fix this issue, put operations on devcd->failing_dev before
>>>> calling the free() callback in devcd_dev_release().
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yu Wang <quic_yyuwang@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/base/devcoredump.c | 5 ++---
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Also, what commit id does this fix?
>>
>> Thanks for your comment :)
>> Do you mean the commit which introduced this issue? It's from initial version of devcoredump.c.
> 
> Ok, but then what in-kernel code has the above pattern to cause this
> "problem"?  Why not fix that up?
> 
We use this API as below:
<Create a device> -> <submit dump on it and wait for completion> -> <Remove the device>.

The difference with the in-kernel code is that the time between <submit dump on it and wait for completion>
and <remove the device> is very short and causes race between sysfs_delete_link() and device_del().
I think devcoredump framework should also cover this case.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h