[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98413d47-986f-bf94-0793-865a5a4dc80d@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 15:18:14 +0530
From: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
To: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@...el.com>,
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Fix the order of argument descriptions
On 10/31/2023 9:43 AM, Yujie Liu wrote:
> The order of descriptions should be consistent with the argument list of
> the function, so "kretprobe" should be the second one.
>
> int __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start(struct dynevent_cmd *cmd, bool kretprobe,
> const char *name, const char *loc, ...)
>
> Fixes: 2a588dd1d5d6 ("tracing: Add kprobe event command generation functions")
> Suggested-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@...el.com>
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
-Mukesh
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> index e834f149695b..47812aa16bb5 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -1020,9 +1020,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kprobe_event_cmd_init);
> /**
> * __kprobe_event_gen_cmd_start - Generate a kprobe event command from arg list
> * @cmd: A pointer to the dynevent_cmd struct representing the new event
> + * @kretprobe: Is this a return probe?
> * @name: The name of the kprobe event
> * @loc: The location of the kprobe event
> - * @kretprobe: Is this a return probe?
> * @...: Variable number of arg (pairs), one pair for each field
> *
> * NOTE: Users normally won't want to call this function directly, but
Powered by blists - more mailing lists