linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] media: rockchip: Add a driver for Rockchip's camera interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZUDOmgmkIifE2w87@aptenodytes>
Date:   Tue, 31 Oct 2023 10:53:30 +0100
From:   Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     Mehdi Djait <mehdi.djait@...tlin.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
        heiko@...ech.de, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, michael.riesch@...fvision.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] media: rockchip: Add a driver for Rockchip's
 camera interface

Hi,

On Tue 31 Oct 23, 10:46, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 31/10/2023 à 10:33, Mehdi Djait a écrit :
> > Hello Christophe,
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 01:47:17PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > > +	/* Create & register platform subdev. */
> > > > +	ret = cif_register_stream_vdev(cif_dev);
> > > > +	if (ret < 0)
> > > > +		goto err_unreg_media_dev;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = cif_subdev_notifier(cif_dev);
> > > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > > > +		v4l2_err(&cif_dev->v4l2_dev,
> > > > +			 "Failed to register subdev notifier(%d)\n", ret);
> > > > +		cif_unregister_stream_vdev(cif_dev);
> > > > +		goto err_unreg_media_dev;
> > > 
> > > Should there be another label with cif_unregister_stream_vdev(cif_dev); if
> > > an error occurs here?
> > > 
> > > CJ
> > 
> > cif_subdev_notifier() is the last function call in the probe with error
> > handling. So it will undo the last successful register:
> > cif_register_stream_vdev and use the goto to unregister the rest.
> 
> Ah, I didn't see the cif_unregister_stream_vdev() call here.
> Sorry for the noise.
> 
> > 
> > I can add a label err_unreg_stream_vdev but it will be only used in the
> > error handling of cif_subdev_notifier() and I don't see the benefit.
> 
> The main benefit is to be more consistent in the way the error path is
> written, and to be more future proof.

Indeed the fact that there is only a single user of the label is not a reason
to avoid the label. As soon as you need to use labels/gotos for error handling,
you should do it for all steps involved and avoid mixing unregistration in the
error-checking condition and using a previous label.

Cheers,

Paul

> 
> CJ
> > 
> > --
> > Kind Regards
> > Mehdi Djait
> > 
> > > > +	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	cif_set_default_format(cif_dev);
> > > > +	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > +err_unreg_media_dev:
> > > > +	media_device_unregister(&cif_dev->media_dev);
> > > > +err_unreg_v4l2_dev:
> > > > +	v4l2_device_unregister(&cif_dev->v4l2_dev);
> > > > +	return ret;
> > > > +}
> > 
> 

-- 
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)